Opinion: Letters To The Editor
October 10th, 2017 2:39 PM
I have a serious concern as a special needs parent (Irving), educator, community member, and general education parent (Hatch). Currently, under key terms on the District 97 vision tab, "equitable" is defined as follows:
Equitable: Is the practice of beliefs and creation of systems that provide access and opportunities for all students in order to eliminate the predictability of outcomes associated with race, gender and socioeconomic status.
I am heartened by this language. As a classroom teacher and reading specialist of 12 years, I am familiar with children of color and children coming from poverty predominating the interventions list each week in data team. However, the other greatest predictor of outcomes (and of who will be on that list each week) is disability status.
While every child is different, in general Individual Educational Plan (IEP) eligibility is a dramatically accurate predictor of lower academic success. Students with a disability are more likely to not meet growth targets, to not attend college, or to be employed as adults. Even more staggering is the predictability of outcomes of children of color who have a disability and are more at risk than their white disabled peers and children of color without a disability.
To personalize this, I will use the example of my son's disability: his autism diagnosis predicts he is less likely to attend college, more likely to be unemployed, and is predicted to die at a younger age than his typical peers. Why are we not listing his statistically-limiting factor in our mission statement? What about the other approximately 900 students with IEPs, including the roughly 380 children of color with IEPs?
Thus, I contend that the district should include the term "disability," as it is an equally great inhibiting factor on student achievement. Language matters.
It is with our word choices we illustrate what is important to us as a community. By omitting disability status from this list, we communicate we are not serious about mitigating the effect of disability as a predictor of achievement.
We also appear naive and unwilling to wrestle with the deeper barriers to achievement.
To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.
Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.
If the kneelers are true to unjustice and police misconduct...
By Brian Slowiak
Posted: October 23rd, 2017 2:22 AM
On: I've got to get out of this...
So they were riding in a car s/bound on Austin at Garfield, were...
By Brian Slowiak
Posted: October 23rd, 2017 2:15 AM
On: Two shot on Oak Park border
Sectional playoff game versus LT is on Wednesday, not Tuesday as...
By Gerri Humbert
Posted: October 22nd, 2017 10:53 PM
On: OPRF soccer cruises to RB Regional...
Debby is a real treasure for our library. Thanks for this great...
By Teresa Powell
Posted: October 22nd, 2017 5:58 PM
On: The programming dervish of the...
Hanukkah is spelled with two K's And the holidays...
By Keith Eddlemon
Posted: October 22nd, 2017 2:37 PM
On: Words associated with Christmas
The reason Divvy works well in Chicago is that I connects people...
By Andy Moss
Posted: October 22nd, 2017 11:59 AM
On: DIVVY a costly program
View All Comments